The Market Reports
Call: +1-631-407-1315 / +91-750-729-1479
Email: sales@themarketreports.com
Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Market Research Report 2024
Synopsis
Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent market is projected to reach US$ million in 2029, increasing from US$ million in 2022, with the CAGR of % during the period of 2023 to 2029. Influencing issues, such as economy environments, COVID-19 and Russia-Ukraine War, have led to great market fluctuations in the past few years and are considered comprehensively in the whole Drilling Mud Treatment Agent market research.
In order to maintain the excellent and stable properties of the mud to meet the needs of the drilling process, treatment agents (additives) must be added to various muds (water-based, oil-based), especially in complex formations (such as collapsed formations, salt-gypsum formations) for deep drilling or horizontal drilling, various treatments are required. There are as many as 2,520 brands of mud treatment agents on the market, but in fact there are about 100 to 200 types of chemicals contained in them. Divided into 16 categories according to the product use, such as viscosifiers, fluid loss reducers, corrosion inhibitors, dilution and dispersants, plugging agents, emulsifiers, shale control agents, etc. In the late 1960s, the application of organic flocculant (polyacrylamide) and selective flocculant (vinyl acetate and maleic anhydride copolymer) developed a non-dispersible mud system and achieved excellent results. For example: in western Canada, the application of this flocculant increased the drilling footage by 56%, the working time of the drill bit by 45%, and the mechanical footage increased by 12%; China began to promote the non-dispersible mud system in 1974, which increased the drilling speed on average 20%. In order to drill deep wells of 7km (bottom hole temperature above 200°C) and geothermal wells (250°C), a compound of resin and lignite, styrene maleic anhydride copolymer, specially synthesized high temperature and salt resistant polymers. The use of drilling mud treatment agents has accumulated a lot of experience. For low-permeability oil wells, inorganic salts such as calcium bromide, zinc bromide, and zinc chloride can be used to prepare completion fluids with high relative density (up to 2.0 or more) and no solids , can increase oil production exponentially; use foaming agent to make ultra-light mud, which can liberate low-pressure oil and gas layers and eliminate lost circulation; use imidazoline corrosion inhibitor and polyoxymethylene fungicide to reduce corrosion loss and prolong drilling tool life; using graphite, oil, hard asphalt and other lubricants can reduce mud bag sticking accidents; using emulsified mud can overcome drilling difficulties in complex formations; using anti-pollution polymers can enable drilling tools to drill into large sections of salt layers; Thickeners (polyacrylamide, hydroxyethyl cellulose, biopolymers) and thinner dispersants (lignite, lignin sulfonates, phosphates) can adjust the flow pattern. Treatments are required to reduce fluid loss, stabilize shale and prevent damage to formations. Hydrogen sulfide is a poisonous gas. Adding sponge iron to the mud can not only be used as an indicator of hydrogen sulfide, but also can quantitatively remove hydrogen sulfide to prevent corrosion and human poisoning caused by it.
Report Scope
This report, based on historical analysis (2018-2022) and forecast calculation (2023-2029), aims to help readers to get a comprehensive understanding of global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent market with multiple angles, which provides sufficient supports to readers’ strategy and decision making.
By Company
SNF
Croda
Schlumberger（SLB)
Lubrizol
Halliburton
Synthomer
Ashland
Chevron Phillips Chemical
Flotek Chemistry
Oleon NV
Prime Eco Group
Baker Hughes
OMNOVA Solutions
Baroid
Segment by Type
Oil Based
Water Based
Segment by Application
Onshore Drilling
Offshore Drilling
Production by Region
North America
Europe
China
Japan
Consumption by Region
North America
United States
Canada
Europe
Germany
France
U.K.
Italy
Russia
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
China Taiwan
Southeast Asia
India
Latin America, Middle East & Africa
Mexico
Brazil
Turkey
GCC Countries
The Drilling Mud Treatment Agent report covers below items:
Chapter 1: Product Basic Information (Definition, type and application)
Chapter 2: Manufacturers’ Competition Patterns
Chapter 3: Production Region Distribution and Analysis
Chapter 4: Country Level Sales Analysis
Chapter 5: Product Type Analysis
Chapter 6: Product Application Analysis
Chapter 7: Manufacturers’ Outline
Chapter 8: Industry Chain, Market Channel and Customer Analysis
Chapter 9: Market Opportunities and Challenges
Chapter 10: Market Conclusions
Chapter 11: Research Methodology and Data Source
Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent market is projected to reach US$ million in 2029, increasing from US$ million in 2022, with the CAGR of % during the period of 2023 to 2029. Influencing issues, such as economy environments, COVID-19 and Russia-Ukraine War, have led to great market fluctuations in the past few years and are considered comprehensively in the whole Drilling Mud Treatment Agent market research.
In order to maintain the excellent and stable properties of the mud to meet the needs of the drilling process, treatment agents (additives) must be added to various muds (water-based, oil-based), especially in complex formations (such as collapsed formations, salt-gypsum formations) for deep drilling or horizontal drilling, various treatments are required. There are as many as 2,520 brands of mud treatment agents on the market, but in fact there are about 100 to 200 types of chemicals contained in them. Divided into 16 categories according to the product use, such as viscosifiers, fluid loss reducers, corrosion inhibitors, dilution and dispersants, plugging agents, emulsifiers, shale control agents, etc. In the late 1960s, the application of organic flocculant (polyacrylamide) and selective flocculant (vinyl acetate and maleic anhydride copolymer) developed a non-dispersible mud system and achieved excellent results. For example: in western Canada, the application of this flocculant increased the drilling footage by 56%, the working time of the drill bit by 45%, and the mechanical footage increased by 12%; China began to promote the non-dispersible mud system in 1974, which increased the drilling speed on average 20%. In order to drill deep wells of 7km (bottom hole temperature above 200°C) and geothermal wells (250°C), a compound of resin and lignite, styrene maleic anhydride copolymer, specially synthesized high temperature and salt resistant polymers. The use of drilling mud treatment agents has accumulated a lot of experience. For low-permeability oil wells, inorganic salts such as calcium bromide, zinc bromide, and zinc chloride can be used to prepare completion fluids with high relative density (up to 2.0 or more) and no solids , can increase oil production exponentially; use foaming agent to make ultra-light mud, which can liberate low-pressure oil and gas layers and eliminate lost circulation; use imidazoline corrosion inhibitor and polyoxymethylene fungicide to reduce corrosion loss and prolong drilling tool life; using graphite, oil, hard asphalt and other lubricants can reduce mud bag sticking accidents; using emulsified mud can overcome drilling difficulties in complex formations; using anti-pollution polymers can enable drilling tools to drill into large sections of salt layers; Thickeners (polyacrylamide, hydroxyethyl cellulose, biopolymers) and thinner dispersants (lignite, lignin sulfonates, phosphates) can adjust the flow pattern. Treatments are required to reduce fluid loss, stabilize shale and prevent damage to formations. Hydrogen sulfide is a poisonous gas. Adding sponge iron to the mud can not only be used as an indicator of hydrogen sulfide, but also can quantitatively remove hydrogen sulfide to prevent corrosion and human poisoning caused by it.
Report Scope
This report, based on historical analysis (2018-2022) and forecast calculation (2023-2029), aims to help readers to get a comprehensive understanding of global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent market with multiple angles, which provides sufficient supports to readers’ strategy and decision making.
By Company
SNF
Croda
Schlumberger（SLB)
Lubrizol
Halliburton
Synthomer
Ashland
Chevron Phillips Chemical
Flotek Chemistry
Oleon NV
Prime Eco Group
Baker Hughes
OMNOVA Solutions
Baroid
Segment by Type
Oil Based
Water Based
Segment by Application
Onshore Drilling
Offshore Drilling
Production by Region
North America
Europe
China
Japan
Consumption by Region
North America
United States
Canada
Europe
Germany
France
U.K.
Italy
Russia
Asia-Pacific
China
Japan
South Korea
China Taiwan
Southeast Asia
India
Latin America, Middle East & Africa
Mexico
Brazil
Turkey
GCC Countries
The Drilling Mud Treatment Agent report covers below items:
Chapter 1: Product Basic Information (Definition, type and application)
Chapter 2: Manufacturers’ Competition Patterns
Chapter 3: Production Region Distribution and Analysis
Chapter 4: Country Level Sales Analysis
Chapter 5: Product Type Analysis
Chapter 6: Product Application Analysis
Chapter 7: Manufacturers’ Outline
Chapter 8: Industry Chain, Market Channel and Customer Analysis
Chapter 9: Market Opportunities and Challenges
Chapter 10: Market Conclusions
Chapter 11: Research Methodology and Data Source
Index1 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Market Overview
1.1 Product Definition
1.2 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Market Value Growth Rate Analysis by Type 2022 VS 2029
1.2.2 Oil Based
1.2.3 Water Based
1.3 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Segment by Application
1.3.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Market Value Growth Rate Analysis by Application: 2022 VS 2029
1.3.2 Onshore Drilling
1.3.3 Offshore Drilling
1.4 Global Market Growth Prospects
1.4.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value Estimates and Forecasts (2018-2029)
1.4.2 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Capacity Estimates and Forecasts (2018-2029)
1.4.3 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Estimates and Forecasts (2018-2029)
1.4.4 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Market Average Price Estimates and Forecasts (2018-2029)
1.5 Assumptions and Limitations
2 Market Competition by Manufacturers
2.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Market Share by Manufacturers (2018-2023)
2.2 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value Market Share by Manufacturers (2018-2023)
2.3 Global Key Players of Drilling Mud Treatment Agent, Industry Ranking, 2021 VS 2022 VS 2023
2.4 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)
2.5 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Average Price by Manufacturers (2018-2023)
2.6 Global Key Manufacturers of Drilling Mud Treatment Agent, Manufacturing Base Distribution and Headquarters
2.7 Global Key Manufacturers of Drilling Mud Treatment Agent, Product Offered and Application
2.8 Global Key Manufacturers of Drilling Mud Treatment Agent, Date of Enter into This Industry
2.9 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.9.1 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Market Concentration Rate
2.9.2 Global 5 and 10 Largest Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Players Market Share by Revenue
2.10 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion
3 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production by Region
3.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value Estimates and Forecasts by Region: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
3.2 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value by Region (2018-2029)
3.2.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value Market Share by Region (2018-2023)
3.2.2 Global Forecasted Production Value of Drilling Mud Treatment Agent by Region (2024-2029)
3.3 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Estimates and Forecasts by Region: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
3.4 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production by Region (2018-2029)
3.4.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Market Share by Region (2018-2023)
3.4.2 Global Forecasted Production of Drilling Mud Treatment Agent by Region (2024-2029)
3.5 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Market Price Analysis by Region (2018-2023)
3.6 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production and Value, Year-over-Year Growth
3.6.1 North America Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value Estimates and Forecasts (2018-2029)
3.6.2 Europe Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value Estimates and Forecasts (2018-2029)
3.6.3 China Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value Estimates and Forecasts (2018-2029)
3.6.4 Japan Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value Estimates and Forecasts (2018-2029)
4 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Consumption by Region
4.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Consumption Estimates and Forecasts by Region: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
4.2 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Consumption by Region (2018-2029)
4.2.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Consumption by Region (2018-2023)
4.2.2 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Forecasted Consumption by Region (2024-2029)
4.3 North America
4.3.1 North America Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Consumption Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
4.3.2 North America Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Consumption by Country (2018-2029)
4.3.3 United States
4.3.4 Canada
4.4 Europe
4.4.1 Europe Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Consumption Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
4.4.2 Europe Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Consumption by Country (2018-2029)
4.4.3 Germany
4.4.4 France
4.4.5 U.K.
4.4.6 Italy
4.4.7 Russia
4.5 Asia Pacific
4.5.1 Asia Pacific Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Consumption Growth Rate by Region: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
4.5.2 Asia Pacific Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Consumption by Region (2018-2029)
4.5.3 China
4.5.4 Japan
4.5.5 South Korea
4.5.6 China Taiwan
4.5.7 Southeast Asia
4.5.8 India
4.6 Latin America, Middle East & Africa
4.6.1 Latin America, Middle East & Africa Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Consumption Growth Rate by Country: 2018 VS 2022 VS 2029
4.6.2 Latin America, Middle East & Africa Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Consumption by Country (2018-2029)
4.6.3 Mexico
4.6.4 Brazil
4.6.5 Turkey
4.6.6 GCC Countries
5 Segment by Type
5.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production by Type (2018-2029)
5.1.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production by Type (2018-2023)
5.1.2 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production by Type (2024-2029)
5.1.3 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Market Share by Type (2018-2029)
5.2 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value by Type (2018-2029)
5.2.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value by Type (2018-2023)
5.2.2 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value by Type (2024-2029)
5.2.3 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value Market Share by Type (2018-2029)
5.3 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Price by Type (2018-2029)
6 Segment by Application
6.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production by Application (2018-2029)
6.1.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production by Application (2018-2023)
6.1.2 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production by Application (2024-2029)
6.1.3 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Market Share by Application (2018-2029)
6.2 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value by Application (2018-2029)
6.2.1 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value by Application (2018-2023)
6.2.2 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value by Application (2024-2029)
6.2.3 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Value Market Share by Application (2018-2029)
6.3 Global Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Price by Application (2018-2029)
7 Key Companies Profiled
7.1 SNF
7.1.1 SNF Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Corporation Information
7.1.2 SNF Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Product Portfolio
7.1.3 SNF Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production, Value, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
7.1.4 SNF Main Business and Markets Served
7.1.5 SNF Recent Developments/Updates
7.2 Croda
7.2.1 Croda Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Corporation Information
7.2.2 Croda Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Product Portfolio
7.2.3 Croda Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production, Value, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
7.2.4 Croda Main Business and Markets Served
7.2.5 Croda Recent Developments/Updates
7.3 Schlumberger（SLB)
7.3.1 Schlumberger（SLB) Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Corporation Information
7.3.2 Schlumberger（SLB) Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Product Portfolio
7.3.3 Schlumberger（SLB) Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production, Value, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
7.3.4 Schlumberger（SLB) Main Business and Markets Served
7.3.5 Schlumberger（SLB) Recent Developments/Updates
7.4 Lubrizol
7.4.1 Lubrizol Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Corporation Information
7.4.2 Lubrizol Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Product Portfolio
7.4.3 Lubrizol Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production, Value, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
7.4.4 Lubrizol Main Business and Markets Served
7.4.5 Lubrizol Recent Developments/Updates
7.5 Halliburton
7.5.1 Halliburton Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Corporation Information
7.5.2 Halliburton Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Product Portfolio
7.5.3 Halliburton Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production, Value, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
7.5.4 Halliburton Main Business and Markets Served
7.5.5 Halliburton Recent Developments/Updates
7.6 Synthomer
7.6.1 Synthomer Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Corporation Information
7.6.2 Synthomer Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Product Portfolio
7.6.3 Synthomer Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production, Value, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
7.6.4 Synthomer Main Business and Markets Served
7.6.5 Synthomer Recent Developments/Updates
7.7 Ashland
7.7.1 Ashland Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Corporation Information
7.7.2 Ashland Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Product Portfolio
7.7.3 Ashland Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production, Value, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
7.7.4 Ashland Main Business and Markets Served
7.7.5 Ashland Recent Developments/Updates
7.8 Chevron Phillips Chemical
7.8.1 Chevron Phillips Chemical Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Corporation Information
7.8.2 Chevron Phillips Chemical Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Product Portfolio
7.8.3 Chevron Phillips Chemical Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production, Value, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
7.8.4 Chevron Phillips Chemical Main Business and Markets Served
7.7.5 Chevron Phillips Chemical Recent Developments/Updates
7.9 Flotek Chemistry
7.9.1 Flotek Chemistry Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Corporation Information
7.9.2 Flotek Chemistry Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Product Portfolio
7.9.3 Flotek Chemistry Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production, Value, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
7.9.4 Flotek Chemistry Main Business and Markets Served
7.9.5 Flotek Chemistry Recent Developments/Updates
7.10 Oleon NV
7.10.1 Oleon NV Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Corporation Information
7.10.2 Oleon NV Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Product Portfolio
7.10.3 Oleon NV Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production, Value, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
7.10.4 Oleon NV Main Business and Markets Served
7.10.5 Oleon NV Recent Developments/Updates
7.11 Prime Eco Group
7.11.1 Prime Eco Group Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Corporation Information
7.11.2 Prime Eco Group Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Product Portfolio
7.11.3 Prime Eco Group Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production, Value, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
7.11.4 Prime Eco Group Main Business and Markets Served
7.11.5 Prime Eco Group Recent Developments/Updates
7.12 Baker Hughes
7.12.1 Baker Hughes Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Corporation Information
7.12.2 Baker Hughes Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Product Portfolio
7.12.3 Baker Hughes Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production, Value, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
7.12.4 Baker Hughes Main Business and Markets Served
7.12.5 Baker Hughes Recent Developments/Updates
7.13 OMNOVA Solutions
7.13.1 OMNOVA Solutions Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Corporation Information
7.13.2 OMNOVA Solutions Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Product Portfolio
7.13.3 OMNOVA Solutions Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production, Value, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
7.13.4 OMNOVA Solutions Main Business and Markets Served
7.13.5 OMNOVA Solutions Recent Developments/Updates
7.14 Baroid
7.14.1 Baroid Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Corporation Information
7.14.2 Baroid Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Product Portfolio
7.14.3 Baroid Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production, Value, Price and Gross Margin (2018-2023)
7.14.4 Baroid Main Business and Markets Served
7.14.5 Baroid Recent Developments/Updates
8 Industry Chain and Sales Channels Analysis
8.1 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Industry Chain Analysis
8.2 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Key Raw Materials
8.2.1 Key Raw Materials
8.2.2 Raw Materials Key Suppliers
8.3 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Production Mode & Process
8.4 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Sales and Marketing
8.4.1 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Sales Channels
8.4.2 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Distributors
8.5 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Customers
9 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Market Dynamics
9.1 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Industry Trends
9.2 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Market Drivers
9.3 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Market Challenges
9.4 Drilling Mud Treatment Agent Market Restraints
10 Research Finding and Conclusion
11 Methodology and Data Source
11.1 Methodology/Research Approach
11.1.1 Research Programs/Design
11.1.2 Market Size Estimation
11.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
11.2 Data Source
11.2.1 Secondary Sources
11.2.2 Primary Sources
11.3 Author List
11.4 Disclaimer
Published By : QY Research
Why ‘The Market Reports’
In Business:
Pre Sales Support:
Post Sales Support:
Turn Around Time:
Clients Served:
Clients Assisted:
Client Types:
Payment:
- Accept global payments [Credit Card / PayPal / Wire Transfer]
- Accept local payments in South Korea, Germany, China and India [Can pay in local currency]
Latest Chemicals Market Reports
Payments Accepted From
Connect with us at
Complete Secure Website
